Have you ever disagreed with someone on anything? Well, if you haven’t, you’re probably lying. There is an art to disagreeing and disagreeing well. I think this is especially important for some of the most opinionated people in the world: bloggers and their tribe (i.e. regular readers).
Some time today, tomorrow, or next week, you will be placed in a position where you disagree. There’s not only a way to say your disagreement, there is a manner that your disagreement can be said in as well.
Today I would like to equip you with the 6 keys to disagreeing well and improving your blogging and commenting etiquette.
The following 6 keys stem from Gordon Fee’s New Testament Exegesis (pg s. 33). Even though he was writing these in regards to disagreeing with commentators on a passage from the Bible, I believe they can be tweaked to equip bloggers and their tribe
6 Keys to Disagreeing Well:
1. Understand what is being said
If you’re not sure what is being said, then do this first:
Ask clarifying questions.
Immerse yourself in what they’re saying. See it as they mean it. Don’t disagree with someone until you know that you’re disagreeing with what they’re actually saying.
WARNING: If you neglect this key and apply the rest of what I have to say then you’re going to be rude and annoying. I figured I should go ahead and let you know
2. Show where the person is misinformed.
People at times will right with misinformation. That is, they have cited incorrect evidence or have misinterpreted the material they’re talking about.
Instead of attacking someone with a barrage of verbal assaults and angry emoticons, I would recommend that you first begin with asking a question like this,
“Based upon the information, how did you come to your conclusion?”
At this point, just sit and wait for a response
If you hear back from them and they say something you disagree with and their adamant in their position, don’t lambast them or burn them in effigy. Just ask them a question to get them to consider another perspective, like this, “Have you ever considered ____?”
3. Show where they are uninformed.
Nothing like talking to someone that’s a “know-it-all.” You know who I’m talking about; the person that knows everything about everything. Other than being annoyed, I usually just ignore them and don’t say anything unless I’m bored and want to ruffle their feathers.
Obviously everyone that is uninformed is not a know-it-all, so there is a different way that we should disagree with these folks.
Personally, I would approach this person in the same way that I would approach someone that is misinformed. There may be information they’re lacking and don’t even know. This is especially true in fields like technology, medicine, and archaeology that have constant changes, findings, and discoveries.
Besides, this approach is still best in leading the person to reconsider their conclusion on a lack of information.
4. Show where they are inconsistent.
Is someone using inconsistent logic in their writing? Sometimes this is hard to find, but other times it’s fairly simple.
For instance, in Christian blogs you can observe this in someone’s argument for abstinence from alcohol. Their logic typically goes like this:
Alcohol itself is not bad, but people abuse alcohol; therefore, we should abstain from drinking it.
Where people become inconsistent at this point is if they refuse to apply this same logic to other categories, say women.
Women are not bad, but people abuse women; therefore, we should abstain from women.
Although people abuse women, this doesn’t mean that we have to become celibate.
5. Show where they misinterpret information with either faulty assumptions and procedures
One thing that we as human beings can never avoid is our presuppositions. Our presuppositions do influence the way that we see the world and interpret information. It’s important that we’re aware of our presuppositions and how they influence the information that we’re looking at.
If we’re not humble in our procedures – the steps that we take – in coming to our conclusion, then our presuppositions may wrongfully influence our conclusion.
To determine if someone is falling victim to this, then I would encourage you to ask questions to get a better idea of their personal beliefs, which will lead you to better understand how they interpreted any given information.
6. Show where they make valuable contributions to the discussion at hand.
There are countless bloggers in the world and the vast majority of them spend time writing and developing their blogs. If you come across something that you like, then by all means let them know. This is a great way to encourage and support their work.
Not only would I leave an encouraging comment, but I would also suggest referring them to your friends (Shameful plug? Perhaps).
On another note, if you’re new to someone’s blog and are commenting a disagreement for the first time, I would suggest refraining from saying anything negative until you establish rapport with the author.
I will admit that I don’t follow this to a “t” myself. What I like to do if I have a disagreement with someone and am commenting for the first time, I like to provide a brief introduction and attempt to phrase my words in a cordial manner (see Comment 71).
3 Steps to Becoming Skilled at Disagreeing
Since you will inevitably disagree with someone in the near future, it will be important to engrain these keys to ensure that you disagree well. To help you become skilled at disagreeing, I recommend the following 3 steps:
- Save this post as a bookmark and use it as a template when disagreeing with someone.
- Browse my own site, find something you disagree with and let me know.
- If you blog, share this with your own tribe and have them disagree with your own work.
Thanks for reading and I hope that this article was helpful to you
[Question: Are there other keys that you would add to disagreeing well?]
Enjoy this post? Consider sharing it with your friends with the Share/Shave below or Tweet above and subscribing to Reformed and Reforming by E-mail or RSS.