Reformed and Reforming

Ecclesia Reformata, Semper Reformanda: The Church Reformed and Always to be Reformed

Compromising in the Political Realm: How Christians can Learn to Rightfully Compromise in Policy, not Conviction

It has been alluded to that faith and government are mutually exclusive.  That is, you have to have one or the other.  Phil Johnson - Executive Director of Grace to You – had the following to say:

Because in order to work in the realm of secular politics, you have to make certain compromises.  Politics is built on compromise.  Anybody who’s involved in politics will affirm that for you.  There are some things you cannot talk about in the political realm and the gospel is one of them.  James Dobson’s political allies in the realm of moral reform include multitudes who would not share his commitment to the gospel of the New Testament (The Foolishness of Preaching the Gospel)

I’m not sure what definition of compromise that Mr. Johnson is using.  However, for a person to compromise is to settle a dispute by accepting “less than they originally wanted.”  So, this means that to compromise in the political process does not mean that a person has to compromise their convictions when working with others – who may or may not be Christians – on any matter.  A person is very well capable of compromising on tactic or policy without having to sell their soul to the Devil. 

Stephen Monsma and Mark Rodgers label such compromises: “half-a-loaf.”  That is, “someone who is working for a certain goal is willing to compromise and accept the partial achievement of that goal on the basis that half a loaf is better than none, as it is often put” (Toward an Evangelical Public Policy, pg. 334). 

For example, “Practical policy making is a craft, and it is more often the art of the possible.  Trade-offs are common.  Should the minimum wage be increased to $10/hour, thereby providing a ‘living wage’ for low-income workers, or will a more modest increase ensure that fewer employees are laid off because they are no longer affordable to business.”  This is just one of many such examples. 

On another note, why does Mr. Johnson believe that a person cannot live thier faith in the political realm and/or share it with others?  Does this just go for government, or does this position include all areas of society?  

Getting back to my point.

Living as a Christian in the world will not naturally make you popular?  (If anything, we’re promised the opposite.  See John 15.19; 17.14).  I imagine the political environment inhabited by William Wilberforce in the 18th and 19th centuries, as he and his allies were working towards the abolition of slavery and moral reform, was no less welcoming than politics today.  Wilberforce went on to write a stinging indictment on faith- in Real Christianity, in which he stated in his introduction,

            I would suggest that faith is everyone’s business.  The advance or decline of faith is so     intimately connected to the welfare of a society that it should be of particular interest to a politician (pg. 17).

I will leave the rest of the book for you to read, but I will let you in on the fact that Wilberforce unhesitatingly lived and spoke his faith in Jesus Christ in both word and deed.  This was not done in the privacy of his own home, but rather publicly at the indifference of many.  What Wilberforce exemplified for us is that it is possible for a person to faithfully and wholeheartedly serve God in public affairs without compromising our convictions.

Finally, considering the make-up of our government, why is it wrong for a person to co-labor with others on mutual causes who do not share a mutual faith in Jesus Christ?  Should Christians not have any dealings with non-Christians?  Should Christians refuse to work in the world with non-Christians?  Should we refuse to purchase products or services made and provided by non-Christians?  Should we not invite non-Christians to church related functions until they think, believe, act, and dress the way that we do?   

Enjoy this post?  Get more like them by subscribing to Reformed and Reforming by E-mail or RSS.   

Consider sharing this post

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Faith and Government are not Mutually Exclusive It has been alluded to that faith and government...
  2. Christianity and Democracy: Understanding their Relationship I have been working on a book for nearly...
  3. Why and How Christians Should Be Involved in the U.S. Political Process The last two weeks we discovered from Romans 13.5...
  4. Does Political Involvement Impede Evangelistic Efforts? At this point, some will understandably contend that a...
  5. Christians are to be Involved in the Democratic Process Distinctly as Christians In Romans 13.1-7 Paul summarizes two primary reasons why...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Tags: , , ,

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

One Response to “Compromising in the Political Realm: How Christians can Learn to Rightfully Compromise in Policy, not Conviction”


  1. My Concerns with the New Faith-Based Young Evangelical Generation « Reformed and Reforming
    on Jun 3rd, 2010
    @ 7:36 am

    [...] I’ve written elsewhere that not all compromises in the political process are bad or sinful, especially with individual involvement. [...]

Leave a Reply

By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution.

© 2009 Reformed and Reforming. All Rights Reserved.

This blog is powered by Wordpress and the Magatheme Pro Magazine Theme for Wordpress and Gazelle Wordpress Themes.